Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]
Дата
Msg-id 1219760301.4126.40.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 11:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> The advantages of doing this would be (a) reduce the number of places
> to look in when implementing a new node type; (b) eliminate some
> cross-subsystem #inclusions that weaken modularity of the backend.

Are we doing either of those things in this release?

Might these changes screw up patches already in progress? Can we hold
off making these changes until we're sure the latter isn't true?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Grant Finnemore
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal to sync SET ROLE and pg_stat_activity
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TODO <-> Commitfest