Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1219091791.7341.6.camel@huvostro обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:05 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2008/8/18 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>: > > Hi, > > > > Le lundi 18 août 2008, Andrew Dunstan a écrit : > >> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> >> This is not the kind of patch we put into stable branches. > >> > >> So what? That is not the only criterion for backpatching. > > > > I fail to understand why this problem is not qualified as a bug. > > > > Does it change of result some queries? Not in the long run, but not invalidating the functions (current behaviour) postpones seeing the results of function change until DBA manually restarts the error-producing client. > It is protection to server's hang? Can't understand this question :( If you mean, does the change protect against hanging the server, then no, currently the server does not actually hang, it just becomes unusable until reconnect :( --------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: