-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
>If you throw enough drives on a quality RAID controller at it you can
>get very good throughput. If you're looking at read only / read
>mostly, then RAID5 or 6 might be a better choice than RAID-10. But
>RAID 10 is my default choice unless testing shows RAID-5/6 can beat
>it.
I'm loading my slave server with RAID-0 based on 3 IDE 7200 Drives.
Is this worst off than a RAID 5 implementation?