Re: big database with very small dump !?
| От | Joao Ferreira gmail |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: big database with very small dump !? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1218538840.6460.25.camel@jmf-ubuntu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: big database with very small dump !? ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: big database with very small dump !?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 10:58 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> It's likely you've got index bloat. If you reload a pg_dump of the
> database in question into another server how much space does that take
> up?
right. just loaded the dump into a clean database and everything came
down about 10 times...
----------------------------------------------
NOW: (injected dump into fresh Pg):
relation | size
----------------------------------+--------
public.timeslots | 549 MB
public.timeslots_strs_var_ts_key | 482 MB
public.timeslots_var_index | 59 MB
public.timeslots_timeslot_index | 37 MB
public.timeslots_timestamp_index | 37 MB
(5 rows)
------------------------------------------------
BEFORE:
relation | size
----------------------------------+---------
public.timeslots_strs_var_ts_key | 5643 MB
public.timeslots | 2660 MB
public.timeslots_timestamp_index | 583 MB
public.timeslots_var_index | 314 MB
public.timeslots_timeslot_index | 275 MB
I'm confused here....
on the fresh database the whole set only takes 1.3G
on the original db, even after VACUUM FULL and REINDEX it takes 9G.
can I really do anything about it ?
If I try cluster, I'm guessing I'll choose the big index and forget
about the smaller ones... is this right ?
thanks
joao
thx
> Look into using CLUSTER or REINDEX to fix the space usage.
>
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: