Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ragnar
Тема Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages
Дата
Msg-id 1218061616.10575.5.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages  (Giorgio Valoti <giorgio_v@mac.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On mið, 2008-08-06 at 20:48 +0200, Giorgio Valoti wrote:
> On 06/ago/08, at 16:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> >
> > it's depend. Start of interpret is only one overhead.
> > Other is date
> > conversions to language compatible types (without C and plpgsql).

> So is plpgsql slower on date conversion than other languages? Just
> curious: why does shared evaluation add some overhead?
>

I am sure he meant "data" conversion , not "date"

gnari



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chirag Dave
Дата:
Сообщение: lossing pg_stat's data
Следующее
От: John DeSoi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: looking for psql without server-installation