yes, I thinks it is unrelated with index, beacause the problem is still
exist after reindex.
I try to change the work memory or shared memory, it's no use:(
regards,
Yi
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 11:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> writes:
> > Yi Zhao wrote:
> >> I don't konw why.
>
> > It almost certainly means that you have a corrupt index.
>
> No, because that assert is nowhere near the index code. I think it's a
> garden-variety bug, but we need a reproducible test case to fix it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>