Re: Additional psql requirements
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Additional psql requirements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1216976225.3894.868.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Additional psql requirements ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Additional psql requirements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:40 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2008/7/25 Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>: > >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:52 AM, daveg <daveg@sonic.net> wrote: > >> > >>> It seems to me that a sql-like client side scripting language should be as > >>> similar as possible to plpgsql. Pgscript looks a bit like plpgsql, but is > >>> pretty much incompatible with it for no particularly obvious reason. > >> > >> pgScript originally used a c-like syntax when it was pgUnitTest iirc. > >> The new version is designed to be familiar to users of T-SQL. > > > > it is little bit unhappy - it's like T-SQL, but it isn't T-SQL - and > > it's far to plpgsql > > I see no point in replicating pl/pgsql. Better to implement anonymous > blocks in the server for that. Agreed. My suggestion was for something much simpler than either. Complex logic can be done in functions. I just wanted an easy way to write install scripts that work on various releases/schemas/environments, works on core and on any platform. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: