Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1216377325.19656.770.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 11:07 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote: > "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > hash lookups can in theory be O(1). I'm not sure whether that applies here? I'm interested in how *this* patch will work, not in more generic algorithm theory. To patch authors: Can we please see a table showing expected number of logical I/Os (i,e, block accesses) for btrees and hash indexes e.g. for 100-byte rows... rows btree hash ---- ----- ---- 10^2 10^3 10^4 10^5 10^6 10^7 10^8 -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: