Re: UUID - Data type inefficient
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UUID - Data type inefficient |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1215706413.10376.176.camel@jd-laptop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UUID - Data type inefficient (Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 12:05 -0400, Mark Mielke wrote: > Mark Mielke wrote: > > I didn't notice that he put 16. Now I'm looking at uuid.c in > > PostgreSQL 8.3.3 and I see that it does use 16, and the struct > > pg_uuid_t is length 16. I find myself confused now - why does > > PostgreSQL define UUID_LEN as 16? > > > > I will investigate if I have time tonight. There MUST be some mistake > > or misunderstanding. 128-bit numbers should be stored as 8 bytes, not 16. > > Grrrr.... Kless you've confused me. 32-bit numbers = 4 bytes, 64-bit > numbers = 8 bytes, 128-bit numbers = 16 bytes. > > You are out to lunch and you dragged me with you. Did we have beer at > least? :-) Sounds like at least 4 and a couple of chasers. > > Cheers, > mark > > -- > Mark Mielke <mark@mielke.cc> > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: