Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?
От | Sushant Sinha |
---|---|
Тема | Re: initdb in current cvs head broken? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1215694363.5948.26.camel@dragflick обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: initdb in current cvs head broken? ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
You are right. I did not do make clean last time. After make clean, make all, and make install it works fine. -Sushant. On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:55 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Sushant Sinha <sushant354@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Seems like a bug to me. Is the tree stable only after commit fests and I > > should not use the unstable tree for generating patches? > > > > I quickly tried on my repo and its working fine. (Well it could be a > bit out of sync with the head). > > Usually, the tree may get a bit inconsistent during the active period, > but its not very common. I've seen committers doing a good job before > checking in any code and making sure it works fine (atleast initdb and > regression tests). > > I would suggest doing a clean build at your end once again. > > Thanks, > Pavan >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: