Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1215627891.11418.12.camel@goldbach обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | No answers on CommitFest procedures? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:58 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Have received exactly zero feedback on the question of whether I should > be assigning reviewers to "WIP" patches or not. I suppose it depends on what exactly "WIP" means, but I should think that if work is still "in progress", the patch is not ready to be reviewed yet. Patches that are truly WIP probably shouldn't be candidates for a commit fest until they are finished, anyway. BTW, the pg_dump lock timeout patch was previously listed as "WIP", but I think it is better classified as "waiting for response". Waiting for a reviewer's comments to be incorporated into a new version of the patch should be a distinct state from waiting for the initial version of the patch to be completed. -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: