Re: [patch] plproxy v2
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [patch] plproxy v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1215532719.29901.16.camel@jd-laptop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [patch] plproxy v2 ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [patch] plproxy v2
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:43 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote: > On 7/8/08, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > First let me say that I too enjoy PL/Proxy quite a bit. However, I don't > > think it needs to be in core. I wouldn't mind seeing it in contrib (or > > better yet modules/ should we ever get around to that). > > I'm not against contrib/ considering that the docs are now nicely > integrated, but then, whats the difference between src/pl/ and contrib/? > I am actually against adding to the grammar which is what Simon was suggesting. If it wants to go into src/pl I wouldn't have a problem with that. Sorry for not being more clear. Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: