Re: Proposal to remove some mailing lists
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal to remove some mailing lists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1215106061.6936.26.camel@jd-laptop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal to remove some mailing lists (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal to remove some mailing lists
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:02 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > On Thursday 03 July 2008 11:57:10 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Except that General is an extremely active list and may cause those > > subscribed to pgsql-php to unsubscribe. Topic specific lists are good. > > > > If we want to get rid of pgsql-php lets do it for something at least > > directional, say pgsql-webdev a list dedicated to web developers using > > PostgreSQL. > > > > This presumes one only uses php for web development... It does? I was assuming that we would have rails, drupal, catalyst etc... all asked there. > really it can be used > for scripting and gui applications as well. Heck, I even heard of some > company trying to use it for database procedural work. > > More on point, why would you seperate web developer questions from other > questions? And how? Not being able to connect to postgres from a webserver is > pretty much the same issue as not connecting from anything else. Or what > about someone using dbd:pg from a script, vs. someone using it to write a > cgi? > > *shrug* > How do I do X with ORM Y and why does PostgreSQL react with Z. People on general may or may not care. People on wwwdev may. > I'm subscribed to both, so it doesnt affect me much, but I don't see much > benefit to having that list as it stands now (and the traffic is pretty low > anyway) I am not arguing that we should keep pgsql-php as much as the idea of dumping people on to general which imo is abused way to much as it is. Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: