Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert

On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > In cases where we know we will assign a real xid, can we just skip the
> > assignment of the virtual xid completely?
> 
> Even if we could do this I doubt it would be a good idea.  It'd destroy
> the invariant that all transactions have a vxid, which at the very least
> would create naming problems.

Ahh, no, I meant go straight to assigning a real xid, to avoid the
wasted effort in inserting a vxid *and* a real xid.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support