Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> * Allow row re-use without vacuum (Tom)

> Well, a name doesn't mean someone claimed it but rather the _expert_ on
> the item.  I added this item assuming it was going to be accomplished
> with some type of auto-vacuum.  I will clearify it to mention
> auto-vacuum, if that is OK.

"Clarify"?  How about "replace completely"?

* Provide automatic scheduling of background vacuum

Still not sure that I'd classify it as URGENT.
        regards, tom lane