Re: YAML

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> +1.  I'm a little concerned about the bit about the YAML specification
> changing, too, but at least if we can ensure that we're compliant with
> the spec that is current at the time the code goes in we have a leg to
> stand on.

If the spec is in flux, that seems like More Than Sufficient reason
to reject the patch for the time being.  It can be resubmitted when
it's no longer shooting at a moving target.
        regards, tom lane