Re: [RFC] PostgreSQL Access Control Extension (PGACE)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [RFC] PostgreSQL Access Control Extension (PGACE)
Дата
Msg-id 12044.1176766164@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] PostgreSQL Access Control Extension (PGACE)  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] PostgreSQL Access Control Extension (PGACE)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [RFC] PostgreSQL Access Control Extension (PGACE)  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Re: [RFC] PostgreSQL Access Control Extension (PGACE)  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> What's more, we have a SoC project for column level access controls.

... which presumably wouldn't involve any added dependency on outside code.
For people who are already using SELinux or Trusted Solaris, making the
database dependent on that infrastructure might be seen as a plus, but
I'm not sure the rest of the world would be pleased.  There are also
some interesting questions about SQL spec compliance and whether a
database that silently hides some rows from you will give semantically
consistent results.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] PostgreSQL Access Control Extension (PGACE)
Следующее
От: "Florian G. Pflug"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RESET command seems pretty disjointed now