Re: Declarative partitioning grammar

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Declarative partitioning grammar
Дата
Msg-id 1200160050.4266.1367.camel@ebony.site
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Declarative partitioning grammar  (Gavin Sherry <swm@alcove.com.au>)
Ответы Re: Declarative partitioning grammar  (Gavin Sherry <swm@alcove.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 01:59 +0100, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> The syntax is half the problem, performance is the other.

The syntax looks great to me, but I think it is about 5% of the problem,
maybe less. I don't really have any questions about the syntax, but I
may have thoughts when the implementation details emerge.

I'm not sure you'll be able to use PARTITION BY since its part of the
SQL Standard for Windowed grouping, which we do hope to implement one
day. It will be confusing to have two completely separate meanings for
the one phrase in our grammar.

The burning questions from my perspective are:

What is a partition?

How will the syntax be implemented within the backend?

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Declarative partitioning grammar
Следующее
От: Markus Schiltknecht
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Some ideas about Vacuum