Re: A caveat of partitioning tables in the document

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: A caveat of partitioning tables in the document
Дата
Msg-id 120.1345693262@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: A caveat of partitioning tables in the document  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: A caveat of partitioning tables in the document
Список pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Kasahara Tatsuhito
> <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The latest document (doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml) says
>> =======================================
>> 2974    <itemizedlist>
>> 2975     <listitem>
>> 2976      <para>
>> 2977       Constraint exclusion only works when the query's <literal>WHERE</>
>> 2978       clause contains constants.  A parameterized query will not be
>> 2979       optimized, since the planner cannot know which partitions the
>> 2980       parameter value might select at run time.  For the same reason,
>> 2981       <quote>stable</> functions such as <function>CURRENT_DATE</function>
>> 2982       must be avoided.
>> 2983      </para>
>> 2984     </listitem
>> =======================================
>> but in my understanding, this problem will be solved on 9.2 (with
>> parameterized plans).
>> 
>> Or some issues still remain ?

> At least this limitation "A parameterized query will not be optimized,
> since the planner cannot know which partitions the parameter value
> might select at run time." has been solved unless I'm missing something.
> So we should just get rid of that sentence from the document.

Yes, I think we can take that out now.  The issue with stable functions
still remains though.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Audit Logs WAS: temporal support patch