Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Sabino Mullane
Тема Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Дата
Msg-id 11d5bdebe8be0e41d270b1b86c555179@biglumber.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide.  Anyone know if
> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg?  If there are fixes needed
> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ...

I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl tests
are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a bunch of
plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests passed.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFHlLMevJuQZxSWSsgRA4neAJoCJtcPusA86PBpZHsmnSWyeKroQACg1CcS
jVgOjqD8ousq5jxIJq3+Sbc=
=XzXA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Hiroshi Saito"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: mklink of pg_standby
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?