Re: Let's get rid of the separate minor version numbers for shlibs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Let's get rid of the separate minor version numbers for shlibs
Дата
Msg-id 11ac2767-ac84-1da1-7c6e-75e44011e8e2@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Let's get rid of the separate minor version numbers for shlibs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Let's get rid of the separate minor version numbers for shlibs  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 8/15/16 3:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> That would give us an automatic annual change in the minor version.
> If we ever made an incompatible change in a shlib, we could advance
> its SO_MAJOR_VERSION but keep this rule for the minor version (there's
> no law that says we have to reset the minor version when we do that).

Let's look into getting rid of the minor versions altogether.  They
don't serve any technical purpose in most cases.  Library packaging
policies have evolved quite a bit over the years; maybe there is some
guidance there to make this simpler.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Anyone want to update our Windows timezone map?
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multivariate statistics (v19)