Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished

Dave,
   Thx I will take a look. I was trying to port a postgres schema to a
database that had embedded capability. I could not find any non-commerical
databases that supported triggers, sequences, udf function, and stored
procedure. I as I remembered firebird has pretty weak UDF function
capability(only C/C++) and the name size limitation was a killer.

Steve

>
>
>> ------- Original Message -------
>> From: "Stephen Ince" <since@opendemand.com>
>> To: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>, "Greg Smith"
>> <gsmith@gregsmith.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>> Sent: 27/08/07, 17:02:21
>> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
>>
>> Postgres can't be embedded or serverless. Firebird has the embedded
>> feature.
>> Most of the databases have this capability (hsqldb, derby,oracle,mysql,
>> firebird, and db2). Derby and hsqldb are the only free embedded databases
>> for commercial use.
>>
>
> SQL Server CE is also free for commercial use iirc.
>
> Regards, Dave
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>