Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
От | Stephen Ince |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11a101c7e8e9$0e6da840$8100a8c0@desktop2 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished ("Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Dave, Thx I will take a look. I was trying to port a postgres schema to a database that had embedded capability. I could not find any non-commerical databases that supported triggers, sequences, udf function, and stored procedure. I as I remembered firebird has pretty weak UDF function capability(only C/C++) and the name size limitation was a killer. Steve > > >> ------- Original Message ------- >> From: "Stephen Ince" <since@opendemand.com> >> To: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>, "Greg Smith" >> <gsmith@gregsmith.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org >> Sent: 27/08/07, 17:02:21 >> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished >> >> Postgres can't be embedded or serverless. Firebird has the embedded >> feature. >> Most of the databases have this capability (hsqldb, derby,oracle,mysql, >> firebird, and db2). Derby and hsqldb are the only free embedded databases >> for commercial use. >> > > SQL Server CE is also free for commercial use iirc. > > Regards, Dave > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: