On 7 Jan 2009, at 09:47, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> It's required by the sync replication patch, but has no value
>> otherwise.
>
> Well, we have talked about allowing more signalling long-term, and
> this
> would accomplish that independent of the sync replication, so we might
> want to revisit this someday if it isn't included in sync replication.
I also needed this for the progress indicator patch. I used SIGQUIT
for the proof-of-concept patch but I wouldn't want to lose that signal
for real.
--
Greg