Re: [Fwd: [PATCHES] archiver ps display]

On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 11:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 10:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> > > I agree that replication should be able to be monitored.  However,
> > > isn't ps_display supposed to show what the process is _currently_ doing?
> > > So if the archiver finishes processing a file, its display should go
> > > back to "idle" or some such.  (Perhaps "idle, last archived XXXYYYZZZ")
> > 
> > That was my first thought, but that ends up with the archiver ps display
> > being mostly blank, and so isn't really very useful.
> 
> What about the second suggestion?

Sorry. My preference is terse, but that looks fine to me.

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com