Re: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 118fbf15-9734-4a83-ac2c-0e2d8d1afdc4@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05.06.25 05:00, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote: > Dear Fujii-san, > >> A bit similar discussion came up before regarding pgbench and program_xxx_ok >> in [1], but it seems that change was never applied. > > I didn't know that, thanks for sharing. ISTM, it tried to extend function to test the > shorter options. > > While verifying the idea, I found that pg_config and pg_bsd_indent have not been > supported "-V" option yet. They must address the option ro improve test functions. > > Attached patch set implemented the idea. 0001 is my original point and can be > backported. 0002-0004 needs API changes so they aim to be applied for HEAD. > > If possible, I want to fork another thread to discuss 0002-0004 and want to > concentrate 0001 here. Patch 0001 looks very sensible. I don't think we need to bother we the other ones. pg_config works differently than the other programs anyway, because --version does not exit the program. And pg_bsd_indent is an externally maintained program. So I think it is ok if these two are intentionally different.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: