Re: POC: Carefully exposing information without authentication
| От | Antonin Houska |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: POC: Carefully exposing information without authentication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11894.1767966998@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: POC: Carefully exposing information without authentication (Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: POC: Carefully exposing information without authentication
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com> wrote: > Version 4 attached, rebased to account for new tests, plus a new instra-test > check to make sure LWP::UserAgent is available before running. I'm still not sure it's necessary to handle the problem at socket level. I imagine it can be implemented this way: 1. Add a new field to the PGconn structure, indicating that the client is only requesting the server status information, and adjust pg_isready so it sets this option. 2. Adjust libpq frontend (pqBuildStartupPacket3) so it adds the corresponding option to the startup packet. 3. On server, if ProcessStartupPacket() sees that option, call ereport(FATAL) with a specific error code, and let the appropriate GUCs control the contents of the error message. pg_isready would then just print out the message. I haven't tried to write any code, so it's possible that I'm missing something. Regarding configuration, I'd prefer a single GUC. The value can be a comma-separated list of keywords, each representing particular piece of information to be exposed. -- Antonin Houska Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: