Re: invalidly encoded strings

On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 23:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the short run it might be best to do it in scan.l after all.  A few
> minutes' thought about what it'd take to delay the decisions till later
> yields a depressingly large number of changes; and we do not have time
> to be developing mostly-cosmetic patches for 8.3.  Given that
> database_encoding is frozen for any one DB at the moment, and that that
> is unlikely to change in the near future, insisting on a solution that
> allows it to vary is probably unreasonable at this stage of the game.
> 

Sounds reasonable to me.

Regards,Jeff Davis