Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Syntax bug? Group by? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11881.1161120113@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Syntax bug? Group by? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Mark Woodward wrote: >> My question, is it a syntactic technicality that PostgreSQL asks for a >> "group by," or a bug in the parser? > AFAIK what you want is not per sql spec. It would in fact be a violation of spec. Consider the case where there are no rows matching 15. In this case select min(tindex), avg(tindex) from y where ycis_id = 15; will yield one row containing NULLs, whereas select min(tindex), avg(tindex) from y where ycis_id = 15 group by ycis_id; will yield no rows (because there are no groups). Therefore, if Postgres were to implicitly insert a GROUP BY to make it legal to reference ycis_id directly, we'd be changing the query behavior and breaking spec. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: