Re: log_autovacuum

On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Gregory Stark wrote:
> >> Could I suggest renaming log_autovacuum to log_autovacuum_min_duration?
> 
> > Sure, whatever makes the most sense.  In fact min_duration would be more
> > consistent.
> 
> I'm not sure I believe Greg's argument about needing more autovac
> logging parameters, but since this one acts just like
> log_min_duration_statement, I concur with renaming it.

log_min_duration_autovacuum

makes the most sense in comparison, IMHO.

--  Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB  http://www.enterprisedb.com