Re: SCMS question
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SCMS question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11854.1172208917@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: SCMS question (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SCMS question
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> [much snipped]
> Why are so few people committers?
> ...
> The answer to both questions is because CVS limitations make it hard to do
> better.
Uh, no. The reason there are so few committers is that there are so few
people qualified not to break things.
If we had a community with hundreds of people with commit access, very
possibly we'd be feeling the need of a better SCM system. But right
now, CVS is not the bottleneck, and I don't see that we'd get a payback
for the pain of changing to something else.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: