Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11853.1152505252@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On Sunday 09 July 2006 20:00, Greg Stark wrote:
>> BIRT pgsql-patches should be abolished in favour of something else that
>> accomplishes the bandwidth-reduction aspect without the downsides.
> Alternatively, people could just use patches for patch submission and keep all
> discussion on hackers.
If this is chosen as the preferred path, we could get the list bot to
add "Reply-To: pghackers" in pgsql-patches postings to help push
discussions there. I'd vote for doing the same in pgsql-committers,
which also gets its share of non-null discussion content.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: