Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11835.1227298022@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC) |
Ответы |
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
(PFC)
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Дерево обсуждения
Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
("Andrus",
)
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Richard Huxton, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Richard Huxton, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alan Hodgson, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Richard Huxton, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alvaro Herrera, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alvaro Herrera, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alvaro Herrera, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Scott Carey, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tom Lane, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Scott Carey, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Richard Huxton, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Richard Huxton, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alan Hodgson, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Richard Huxton, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alvaro Herrera, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alvaro Herrera, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Alvaro Herrera, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Scott Carey, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tom Lane, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (PFC, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Scott Carey, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (Tomas Vondra, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds (, )
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds ("Andrus", )
PFC <> writes: > Index on orders_products( product_id ) and orders_products( order_id ): > => Same plan > Note that in this case, a smarter planner would use the new index to > perform a BitmapAnd before hitting the heap to get the rows. Considering that the query has no constraint on orders_products.order_id, I'm not sure what you think the extra index is supposed to be used *for*. (Well, we could put orders as the outside of a nestloop and then we'd have such a constraint, but with 30000 orders rows to process that plan would lose big.) (And yes, the planner did consider such a plan along the way. See choose_bitmap_and.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: