Re: PITR Backups

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: PITR Backups
Дата
Msg-id 1182790567.9276.609.camel@silverbirch.site
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PITR Backups  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: PITR Backups  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: PITR Backups  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 12:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dan Gorman <dgorman@hi5.com> writes:
> > Jun 21 00:39:43 sfmedstorageha001 postgres[3506]: [9-1] 2007-06-21
> > 00:39:43 PDTLOG:  redo done at 71/99870670

This is mid-way through an xlog file.

> > Jun 21 00:39:43 sfmedstorageha001 postgres[3506]: [10-1] 2007-06-21
> > 00:39:43 PDTWARNING:  page 28905 of relation 1663/16384/76718 was
> > uninitialized
> > ... lots of these ...
> > Jun 21 00:39:43 sfmedstorageha001 postgres[3506]: [40-1] 2007-06-21
> > 00:39:43 PDTPANIC:  WAL contains references to invalid pages
>
> (BTW, you'll find putting a space at the end of log_line_prefix
> does wonders for log readability.)
>
> Reformatting and sorting, we have
>
> WARNING: page 28900 of relation 1663/16384/76718 was uninitialized
> WARNING: page 28902 of relation 1663/16384/76718 was uninitialized

> WARNING: page 26706 of relation 1663/16384/76719 was uninitialized
> WARNING: page 26708 of relation 1663/16384/76719 was uninitialized

Those two are interesting because we appear to have two valid pages in
the middle of some uninitialized ones. That implies were not looking at
an unapplied truncation.

--
  Simon Riggs
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PITR Backups
Следующее
От: Dan Gorman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PITR Backups