Re: Apparent Wraparound?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От g.hintermayer@inode.at
Тема Re: Apparent Wraparound?
Дата
Msg-id 1181738151.663659.258770@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Apparent Wraparound?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Apparent Wraparound?
Список pgsql-general
On Jun 8, 3:23 pm, alvhe...@commandprompt.com (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
> Gunther Mayer wrote:
> > Hi there,
>
> > I just found the following message in my logs:
>
> > Jun  8 10:38:38 caligula postgres[56868]: [1-1] : LOG:  could not
> > truncate directory "pg_subtrans": apparent wraparound
>
> > Should I be worried or can I just ignore this one? My database is still
> > small (a pg_dumpall bzippe'd is still around 500KB) so I doubt that I'm
> > affected by any transaction id wraparound problems. I also vacuum
> > analyze once a day and have pg_autovacuum turned on.
>
> What version are you running?  This seems to match the description of a
> bug fixed for 8.2 and 8.1.5:
>

I noticed the same message in my logfiles (once on each of two
servers). I'm running 8.1.8, and the server's been running flawless
for about 2 months.

Gerhard


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jyoti Seth"
Дата:
Сообщение: setof or array as input parameter to postgresql 8.2 functions
Следующее
От: "Pavel Stehule"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [SQL] setof or array as input parameter to postgresql 8.2 functions