Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts
| От | Andrew Hammond |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1181065959.618700.42900@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 5, 9:19 am, alvhe...@commandprompt.com (Alvaro Herrera) wrote: > Zdenek Kotala wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >Bruce Momjian <b...@momjian.us> writes: > > >>Is this a TODO? > > > >I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody but Zdenek to remove > > >those programs. Has it ever even come up before? > > Personally I found really strange to have "createuser" and "createdb" > shipped by Postgres when I started using it. I just didn't complain. +1. Given the prevalence of the pg_foo convention, those names are clunky. So is initdb. I'm less creative than Zdenek, so I'd suggest simply renaming to pg_createuser and friends with the same command line options as the originals. Have the binaries check $0 and emit a warning about using the deprecated name to STDERR if called by a name that doesn't have the pg_ prefix. Default to symlinking the old names for backwards compatibility until 9.0. Andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: