Re: Seq scans status update
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Seq scans status update |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1180563838.26915.192.camel@dogma.v10.wvs обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Seq scans status update (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 17:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > According to Heikki's explanation here > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00498.php > each backend doing a heapscan would collect its own ring of buffers. > You might have a few backends that are always followers, never leaders, > and so never actually fetch any pages --- but for each backend that > actually did any I/O there would be a separate ring. In practice I'd > expect the lead would "change hands" pretty often and so you'd see all > the backends accumulating their own rings. > Oh, I see what you mean. The rings will actually become sparsely populated with many concurrent scans, and therefore, extend outside of L2 cache. Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: