Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11802.1342456020@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> The documentation on MacOS X isn't quite as explicit, but I'd still be
> astonished if we found any other behavior. TBH, I'd be kind of
> surprised if this is the only place in our code base that relies on
> the initial contents of shared memory being all-zeros.
Maybe so, but if we find any others, I'll be wanting to change them too.
It's bad practice and worse documentation for modules to be silently
assuming that anything has a value they didn't explicitly give it.
A related practice that probably costs us a lot more, in both code space
and time, is that most (all?) places that create Node objects explicitly
initialize every field of the Node struct, even though makeNode() has
a palloc0 underneath it and so setting fields to zero is redundant.
I believe that this is a good practice anyway, for documentation and
code greppability reasons.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: