I'm not interested in pushing for inclusion, this is
just an observation.
On 05/16/2007 03:20:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> This seems rather pointless unless we were going to undertake to make
> outfuncs.c support *all* raw-grammar node types.
Isn't having something better than having nothing?
It's not like it matters at all one way or the other
to the end-user. It's just for the developers. (?)
Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein