Re: Integer datetimes
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Integer datetimes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1178379487.18303.112.camel@goldbach обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Integer datetimes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Integer datetimes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 11:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > We've so far managed to avoid having any hard dependency on a working > int64 type, but this would certainly be one. I don't really think the > code-size-reduction argument is strong enough to justify that. What benefit do we get from avoiding this dependency? Can we really avoid a dependency on a 64-bit integral type in the long run? > I'm not necessarily opposed to changing the default configure selection, > but I am opposed to removing the FP code entirely. I would be satisfied with changing the default to integer and deprecating the FP code (but keeping it around as a configure option). Are there any objections to doing this for 8.3? -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: