Re: varchar as primary key

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: varchar as primary key
Дата
Msg-id 1178229248.28383.296.camel@dogma.v10.wvs
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: varchar as primary key  ("Alexander Staubo" <alex@purefiction.net>)
Ответы Re: varchar as primary key  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 22:32 +0200, Alexander Staubo wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Matthew Hixson <hixson@poindextrose.org> wrote:
> >    Is there a significant performance difference between using int
> > primary keys and string primary keys in Postgres?
>
> PostgreSQL uses B-trees for its indexes, insertion time is logarithmic
> regardless of the type of the key, but strings have a larger overhead
> since they involve character comparisons; (i - j) is a lot faster than
> strcmp(i, j). If you do go for strings, I would suggest that the

If you're using a non-C locale, it's slower than strcmp() too.
PostgreSQL has to do an extra memcpy() in order to use strcoll(),
because strings in postgresql aren't necessarily NULL-terminated and
there's no such thing as strncoll(), unfortunately (a comment in the
code points this out).

This mostly matters in sorting. If your B-tree is in memory and you do a
simple lookup (what else would you do with UUIDs?), it's unlikely to
take very long at all.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Listmail
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Indexing questions: Index == key? And index vs substring - how successful?
Следующее
От: philippe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Server crash on postgresql 8.2.4 with tsearch2