Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
| От | Devrim Gündüz |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1175841758.1680.2.camel@your-0548c161e1 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@tocr.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 01:23 -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > > The other thing to consider is that CentOS 5 has Xen built right in, > so you should be able run VMs without VMWare on it. ... if the kernel of the OS has Xen support, there will be no performance penalty (only 2%-3%) (Para-virtualization). Otherwise, there will be full-virtualization, and we should expect a performance loss about 30% for each guest OS (like Windows). Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: