Re: Thread-safe configuration option appears to
От | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Thread-safe configuration option appears to |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 117470000.1060017794@lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Thread-safe configuration option appears to (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Thread-safe configuration option appears to
(Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Thread-safe configuration option appears to (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) Re: Thread-safe configuration option appears to (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) Re: Thread-safe configuration option appears to (Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
--On Monday, August 04, 2003 13:19:57 -0400 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> >> --On Monday, August 04, 2003 13:11:45 -0400 Bruce Momjian >> <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: >> >> > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> >> > We decided to make separate thread/nonthread libraries if the >> >> >> > threading requires any special flags --- we haven't done that >> >> >> > yet, and only configure controls it. >> >> >> That will be a POLA (principle of least astonishment) violation on >> >> >> UnixWare. >> >> > >> >> > When we have the capability to do dual library builds, we might >> >> > have a way to specify a threading flag that will apply to the main >> >> > libpq and not create a libpq_r. If it is a good flag, can we use >> >> > it in the template file for all compiling? >> >> I **THINK** so. What I'm thinking of is -D_REENTRANT for UnixWare >> >> especially for libpq. >> >> >> >> the --with-threads would cause ecpg to be compiled/linked as -lpthread >> >> in addition to >> >> -D_REENTRANT >> > >> > Nope, we are not going to link with -lpthread unless it is enabled in >> > configure. >> Right. but libpq should be built with -D_REENTRANT on UnixWare >> regardless of the >> --with-threads. > > Well, let's see what additional functionality we need. I am not > feeling too friendly on SCO/Unixware right now to jump through hoops. Let's not go there. I'm not involved in the IP fight, but I am a USER on that platform, and SCO is thinking ****SERIOUSLY**** about shipping PG on the Platform as part of their extensions offering. What the fr*** harm is it in passing -D_REENTRANT into the libpq build on UnixWare irregardless of the --with-threads* flag? Same argument for allowing the PORT to determine whether to allow/permit the full pathname in for DT_SONAME. Let's not run people off because of what the damn lawyers are doing. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: