Re: problem with plural-forms

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: problem with plural-forms
Дата
Msg-id 11740.1243348150@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: problem with plural-forms  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> ... Notice also that we have subtly embedded the
> preferred English phrase ordering here: if someone wants to pull the
> same type of trick in a language where the bytecount ought to come
> first, he's just plain out of luck.

Uh, scratch that [ not enough caffeine yet ].  What this coding embeds
is the assumption that the filecount is the only variable we might wish
to replace with a constant string, which is safe enough since that's the
only one that we know a fixed value for in any one ngettext string.

Still, I agree with Greg's opinion that this is just not a real good
thing to be doing.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: problem with plural-forms
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: problem with plural-forms