Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Err... wait. Actually, I think the right thing to do might be to
> remove OCLASS_FOREIGN_TABLE altogether. I don't think it's actually
> used for anything. For a foreign table, we use OCLASS_CLASS, just as
> we do for indexes and sequences. I think that's just leftover crap
> that I failed to rip out.
OK. I'll fix it as part of the extensions patch, since it's touching
all those same places anyway.
regards, tom lane