Re: Transaction atomicity

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Giuseppe Sacco
Тема
Re: Transaction atomicity
Дата
Msg-id
1173288305.20645.67.camel@scarafaggio
Ответ на
Re: Transaction atomicity (Heikki Linnakangas)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Transaction atomicity "Albe Laurenz" <all@adv.magwien.gv.at>
Re: Transaction atomicity Giuseppe Sacco <giuseppe@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org>
Hi Heikki,

Il giorno mer, 07/03/2007 alle 16.36 +0000, Heikki Linnakangas ha
scritto:
[...]
> If you don't want to have a two-field key, for example because you can't 
> change the schema you already have, you could still divide a range of 
> ids for each office when you create the sequence:
> 
> CREATE SEQUENCE fooseq MINVALUE 10000000 MAXVALUE 19999999 NO CYCLE

This is the same solution I was thinking of, and probably the best one.
I checked that currently the application only loops an average of 4
times, so I don't have a real urgency of switching to sequences. I will
implement this code in two weeks from now, since I should have enough
time.

Thanks again,
Giuseppe

P.S. Just a note, I will not specify "NO CYCLE" since it seems to be the
default behaviour and since it seems oracle uses "NOCYCLE" in one word.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transaction atomicity
От: Heiko W.Rupp
Дата:
FAQ