On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 00:54 +0100, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> But it would break the idea of letting a second seqscan follow in the
> first's hot cache trail, no?
No, but it would make it somewhat harder to achieve without direct
synchronization between scans. It could still work; lets see.
I'm not sure thats an argument against fixing the problem with the
buffer strategy though. We really want both, not just one or the other.
-- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com