Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1171308051.3565.18.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction ("Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha" <ezequias.rocha@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:08, Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote: > I mean really deadlock. Other transactions can't access the database > until the main transaction is complete. A question: > > PostgreSQL doesn't permit multiple transactions concurrently ? Again, that's not a deadlock. A deadlock would mean that the transaction causing the lock never returned, because it wound up waiting for another transaction that was in turn waiting on it. i.e. begin transaction a begin trasnaction b a does something that waits on b b does something that waits on a neither transaction can complete. What you have is a blocking transaction. In postgresql, very few transactions tend to block other transactions. Have you got a test case that demonstrates your problem with blocking?
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: