Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1170876010.5454.37.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
| Ответы |
Subject supressed
Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:33 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Is a test going to get added to the regression tests to catch similar > regressions in the future? While we can modify the regression tests to catch this specific problem in the future, I wonder if there ought to be more testing of security releases in the future. When a problem is reported, fixed, tested, and the resulting security fix is publicly distributed all without public discussion (e.g. on the -hackers list), that sounds like an invitation to introduce regressions to me. -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: