On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now
> > > that the holiday break is over:
> > >
> > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
> > >
> >
> > Some of these look obsolete. Also,
> >
> > . the plperl out params patch needs substantial rework by its author, IMHO.
> > . there is a new version of the enums patch that has been submitted.
>
> Yes, I will have to go through it, find the valuable ones, and get
> comments.
Sounds good.
I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
up on either list. I haven't made a list of these, but they include
major patches such as Grouped Item indexes and a number of others. Many
of those are clearly marked as ready to apply/review/reject.
Can I request that those be reviewed first? The unapplied patches list
looks long and many things on it aren't even patches, AFAICS -
presumably TODO items-in-waiting?
Some minor points:
[PATCHES] Incrementally Updated Backup, Simon Riggs
has already been applied to 8.2
[PATCHES] WAL logging freezing, Heikki Linnakangas
has already been agreed/applied to 8.2
-- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com