Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
Дата
Msg-id 1167763007.14243.18.camel@dogma.v10.wvs
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS  (Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 07:52 -0500, Ron wrote:
> A= go through each query and see what work_mem needs to be for that
> query to be as RAM resident as possible.  If you have enough RAM, set
> work_mem for that query that large.  Remember that work_mem is =per
> query=, so queries running in parallel eat the sum of each of their work_mem's.

Just to clarify, from the docs on work_mem at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-
resource.html :

"Specifies the amount of memory to be used by internal sort operations
and hash tables before switching to temporary disk files. The value is
specified in kilobytes, and defaults to 1024 kilobytes (1 MB). Note that
for a complex query, several sort or hash operations might be running in
parallel; each one will be allowed to use as much memory as this value
specifies before it starts to put data into temporary files. Also,
several running sessions could be doing such operations concurrently. So
the total memory used could be many times the value of work_mem; it is
necessary to keep this fact in mind when choosing the value. Sort
operations are used for ORDER BY, DISTINCT, and merge joins. Hash tables
are used in hash joins, hash-based aggregation, and hash-based
processing of IN subqueries."

Regards,
    Jeff Davis


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Erik Jones
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Slow dump?
Следующее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Config parameters